secplus

Dashboard / 1.0 General Security Concepts

1.2 Summarize fundamental security concepts

Official exam objective outline (7 topics)
  • Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (CIA)
  • Non-repudiation
  • Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA)
    • Authenticating people
    • Authenticating systems
    • Authorization models
  • Gap analysis
  • Zero Trust
    • Control Plane: Adaptive identity, Threat scope reduction, Policy-driven access control, Policy Administrator, Policy Engine
    • Data Plane: Implicit trust zones, Subject/System, Policy Enforcement Point
  • Physical security
    • Bollards
    • Access control vestibule
    • Fencing
    • Video surveillance
    • Security guard
    • Access badge
    • Lighting
    • Sensors: Infrared, Pressure, Microwave, Ultrasonic
  • Deception and disruption technology
    • Honeypot
    • Honeynet
    • Honeyfile
    • Honeytoken

From class (Day 1): Confidentiality → encryption. Integrity → SHA-256 (was the file modified? hash it — hashes are one-way; SHA-256 is safe; a collision attack is when two inputs produce the same hash). Availability → server clustering, load balancers, RAID. Non-repudiation → digital signature. Obfuscation → "hard to figure out." Confidentiality controls — managerial: least privilege, need to know, separation of duties ("just give control as much as needed"); technical: encryption, access control (smart cards), steganography. Integrity controls: hashing, digital signatures, backups, version control. Availability controls: redundancy, fault tolerance, patch management. Implicit allow = everything allowed by default (bad); implicit deny is the secure default. Zero Trust → "verify everything before use." Windows share permissions: RO / RW / FC / NA, assigned via AGDLP (Accounts → Global → Domain Local → Permissions). A MAC address should be unique.

Breakdown 1 — The CIA triad (and its two extensions)

PropertyQuestion it answersProtected byAttacked by
ConfidentialityCan only authorized people read it?Encryption, access controls, classification, DLPEavesdropping, data breach, shoulder surfing
IntegrityIs it unchanged and trustworthy?Hashing, digital signatures, checksums, version control, change managementTampering, on-path modification, malware
AvailabilityCan I get to it when I need it?Redundancy, backups, load balancing, UPS, patchingDoS/DDoS, ransomware, hardware failure

Two properties the exam adds to the triad:

  • Non-repudiation — the sender cannot deny having sent/signed it. Provided by digital signatures (private key signs, public key verifies). Hashing alone does not give non-repudiation; a MAC (shared secret) does not either, because both parties hold the key.
  • Authenticity — proof that data/people are genuine; also from digital signatures and certificates.

Exam tip: If the question says "prove who sent it and that they can't deny it" → digital signature / non-repudiation. If it says "prove it wasn't changed" → hash / integrity.

Breakdown 2 — AAA

AMeaningAnswersExamples
AuthenticationProve you are who you claimWho are you?Password, MFA, certificate, biometric
AuthorizationWhat you're allowed to do once authenticatedWhat can you do?ACLs, permissions, RBAC, policies
AccountingRecord what you didWhat did you do?Logs, audit trails, session records
  • Authenticating people — factors: something you know / have / are / somewhere you are.
  • Authenticating systems — devices prove identity with certificates (802.1X, device certs), TPM-backed keys, API keys, mutual TLS.
  • Authorization models — DAC, MAC, RBAC, rule-based, ABAC (detail in 4.6). Know that authorization happens after authentication and is enforced by policy.

Protocols that provide AAA: RADIUS (UDP, encrypts only the password, combines authN+authZ), TACACS+ (TCP, encrypts the whole payload, separates all three — Cisco device admin), Kerberos, Diameter.

Breakdown 3 — Gap analysis

Compare where you are (current security posture) with where you should be (a framework, regulation, or target state), then list the gaps and a plan to close them. Steps: define scope/baseline → gather data (interviews, scans, audits) → analyze deltas → prioritize → remediation roadmap. Often the first step when adopting a standard (e.g., NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS).

Breakdown 4 — Zero Trust

Motto: "never trust, always verify." No implicit trust based on network location; every request is authenticated, authorized, and continuously evaluated.

Two planes (from NIST SP 800-207):

PlaneRoleComponents
Control planeDecides whether access is grantedPolicy Engine (makes the decision), Policy Administrator (issues/revokes the session token & tells the enforcement point), adaptive identity (risk-based, context-aware authentication), threat scope reduction (limit blast radius: least privilege, micro-segmentation), policy-driven access control
Data planeActually carries and enforces the accessSubject/system (the user/device asking), Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) (gateway that allows/denies per the control plane's decision), implicit trust zones (the small area behind the PEP where the connection is trusted for that session)

Policy Engine + Policy Administrator together are called the Policy Decision Point (PDP).

CONTROL PLANE — decides Policy Enginegrant / deny (adaptive identity, risk) Policy Administratortells the PEP, issues session = Policy Decision Point DATA PLANE — carries & enforces Subject / systemuser + device PEPenforcement point (gateway) Resourceimplicit trust zone decision
Engine decides → Administrator communicates → PEP enforces. "Never trust, always verify."

Exam tip: "Which component enforces the decision?" → PEP (data plane). "Which component makes the decision?" → Policy Engine (control plane). "Which component communicates the decision to the PEP?" → Policy Administrator.

Breakdown 5 — Physical security

ControlWhat it doesType
BollardsPosts/barriers that stop vehicles, not peoplePreventive
Access control vestibule (mantrap)Two interlocking doors; only one opens at a time — stops tailgating/piggybackingPreventive
FencingPerimeter barrier; height/design sets how much it prevents vs. detersPreventive/Deterrent
Video surveillanceCameras; deters when visible, detects when reviewed; can use motion detection/object recognitionDeterrent/Detective
Security guardHuman judgment, can challenge people, check IDs, respondDeterrent/Detective/Preventive
Access badgeProof of authorization; can be smart card, RFID, proximity; combine with PIN for MFAPreventive
LightingRemoves hiding spots; deters and aids cameras/guardsDeterrent
SensorsInfrared (body heat), pressure (weight on floor/mat), microwave (motion via reflected radio), ultrasonic (motion via sound)Detective

Breakdown 6 — Deception and disruption technology

ToolWhat it isPurpose
HoneypotA deliberately vulnerable-looking systemLure attackers, study their techniques, waste their time
HoneynetA whole network of honeypotsLarger, more realistic lure; observe lateral movement
HoneyfileA fake file with an attractive name ("passwords.xlsx")Access to it = alert; nobody legitimate should touch it
HoneytokenFake data (credentials, API key, DB record, email address)If it's ever used, you know exactly where the leak came from

Deception = detective control + threat intelligence; it also disrupts attackers by feeding them bad data (e.g., fake DNS records, bogus hosts).

Quick self-check

  • Which CIA property does a backup protect? (Availability.) A hash? (Integrity.)
  • Digital signature gives which two properties beyond integrity? (Authenticity and non-repudiation.)
  • Name the data-plane component that enforces Zero Trust decisions. (PEP.)
  • What kind of sensor detects body heat? (Infrared.)

Sources: 20260917_173138.jpg, 20260917_173153.jpg, 20260917_173159.jpg, 20260917_173429.jpg, 20260917_173519.jpg